Using a virtual host, users can "share" the space on other websites. This is like renting a room in a shared house -although users have their own small areas, this small area is actually only part of the public space. Virtual hosting is the cheapest custody product. It has its benefits, but sometimes it brings some trouble.

　　The VPS host can be regarded as renting an apartment in a building -users will have more rooms, more space and higher flexibility, and the price is more expensive. Users will have higher levels of control, but still operate in servers shared with others.

　　Because the general definition is not sufficient enough, some comparisons between the two hosts will be provided below to help users better decide which host to choose:

　　Security and performance

　　No matter what websites users have, security is essential. Both host types are relatively secure and stable methods for hosting websites, but there are some differences. If a virtual host is used, when another site is wrong, the user site may be affected. In addition, if others take up too much shared bandwidth, the user's own website will slow down.

　　VPS can avoid this problem, and its partition server will ensure that each website can work accordingly. However, if the user lacks technical knowledge about how to maintain the VPS host, you should consider their choices carefully. If the management is not good, it may cause a lot of problems in other aspects.

　　control

　　If the user is looking for more advanced options for the website, VPS hosts are more suitable than virtual hosts. It will grant ROOT access rights for the server, so users can install their own operating systems, control panels and software to optimize the performance and security of the site. For example, the VPS host of JTTI provides these permissions, and with a CPANEL control panel, providing independent IP addresses and sufficient traffic at the TB level. Virtual hosting is limited to standardized server management. This may be more convenient for users who do not want to interfere with the server management task.

　　Server management

　　If the user chooses to use a virtual host to host the website, then it is almost not required to maintain technical maintenance. Virtual hosting providers will set up the server, install and upgrade the necessary software, monitor the server to avoid shutdown and effectively take care of the back end. However, the VPS host needs more advanced knowledge to manage. Fortunately, the VPS host allows users to customize and configure applications and software to improve website performance. It also supports users to customize the back end as needed.

　　Scalability

　　For virtual hosting, if the website reaches the peak of high flow, it will encounter more problems in terms of overall performance, but the VPS host is relatively easy to expand.

　　VPS hosts make the website expand quickly and easily. If the user can predict the growth of the website, the VPS host will be a major investment in the future.

　　Price

　　The virtual host wins at this point, but the VPS host can provide users with the advantages that the virtual host cannot provide. However, the custody solution is largely dependent on the expectations of the website, so the two hosting schemes have their own benefits.

　　Before selecting the network custody plan for the website, consider the most interested function type. The following is a review of the main points of this article:

　　Safety and performance: Virtual hosts require users to share space with others; VPS hosts are more stable and secure, but they need extra technical knowledge.

　　Server management: Virtual hosting is more suitable for beginners than VPS hosts, but lacks custom freedom than the latter.

　　Scalability: VPS hosts are more forward -looking than virtual hosts.

　　Price: Both hosts have different prices and different benefits. Before making choices, users should consider the hosting costs required by the website.